>> ASIAONE / BUSINESS / NEWS / MY MONEY / STORY
Fri, Apr 03, 2009
The Straits Times
'Guaranteed' principal was just an 'oversight'

MY FATHER and I share the frustrations experienced by Mr Victor Khoo ('Minibonds: Bank adamant despite MAS advice'; March 27)

My Cantonese-speaking father, 78, who barely has a Primary 2 Chinese education, went to United Overseas Bank (UOB) to roll over his fixed deposit (FD), which was maturing in July last year. But he was persuaded by a personal banker into buying - with a good part of his retirement savings - what he believed was a three-year FD. It turned out to be a Merrill Lynch principal-protected structured product. At this time, Merrill Lynch was already known to be in financial difficulties.

When my siblings and I discovered this, we met the said personal banker to void this non-FD transaction. We later met the bank's compliance officers, but came away feeling UOB was more interested in justifying its actions than listening to us. We refused to sign the draft minutes which didn't reflect our key points.

Despite many exchanges thereafter, the bank declined our request to void the purchase. In September, Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch were both reported to be collapsing. Extremely distressed, my father redeemed the product and suffered a loss of nearly $50,000 in just two months.

The reason my father thought it was an FD was because the personal banker had assured him it was guaranteed. She had also written in his 'My Wealth Planner' document that the 'principal is guaranteed upon maturity' - which was untrue and misleading as it was not a guaranteed product.

When questioned, UOB, in its written reply, dismissed it as an 'oversight' by its personal banker, again declining to compensate my father and referring us to the Financial Industry Disputes Resolution Centre (Fidrec).

We are truly appalled and disappointed. Clearly, the bank must be accountable for its mistakes. For UOB to just pass this off as an oversight, without redress, is really untenable. We sincerely hope the Monetary Authority of Singapore would render direct help to such affected consumers like my father.

Chin Kin Yam (Madam)

This article was first published in The Straits Times.


 

 
STORY INDEX
 
  Minibonds: Bank ready to address client's concerns
   
 
  'Guaranteed' principal was just an 'oversight'
   
 
  Taiwan family loses lawsuit against HSBC arm
   
 
  Mortgage payments worry S'poreans; expats fret over pay
   
 
  The dangers of printing money
   
 
  S-chips under greater scrutiny
   
 
  Rebates the main draw for Everyday card
   
 
  CIMB Wealth forms alliance with AIA
   
 
  Earn $15 million a year? He didn't buy their line
   
 
  Too good to be true?
   
>> RELATED STORY
'Guaranteed' principal was just an 'oversight'
Loss of secrecy won't hurt banks in S'pore
Hypocrisy in 'tax haven' rules
Lifting bank secrecy veil may help Singapore
Switch banks? You must be kidding

Elsewhere in AsiaOne...

News: US banks lost $40b in Q4

 

We welcome contributions, comments and tips.
a1admin@sph.com.sg