China-Philippine conflict a test of US commitment

China-Philippine conflict a test of US commitment
Vietnamese and Philippine protesters shouting anti-China slogans in front of the Chinese consular office in Manila earlier this month. The three countries are locked in disputes over the South China Sea.

Despite all the publicity about the tension between China and Vietnam over the presence of a Chinese oil rig in waters near the disputed Paracel Islands, it is the Chinese- Philippine relationship that could more easily spiral out of control.

The reason is simple: There is little to hold back a sharp deterioration in Chinese-Philippine relations. And US involvement is encouraging China to believe it should establish a clear "red line" when it comes to the South China Sea disputes.

Anti-China demonstrations in Vietnam led to attacks on foreign industries with Chinese character signs, owned by Chinese (including Taiwanese), Singaporean and South Korean manufacturers.

Understandably, domestic considerations may have influenced the decisions of both the Chinese and the Vietnamese governments during the recent diplomatic row. However, precisely because this conflict is domestic-oriented, leaders in both countries know where and how to control the situation.

The Vietnamese government clamped down on the anti-China protests on May 18. China's official media has also asked the Chinese people to trust the Party to resolve the problem.

However, in the case of the Philippines, the Chinese and Philippine politicians appear to be playing a different game that involves external players as well as domestic nationalist forces. This makes the conflict relatively harder to control or predict. The lack of private information or channels has further complicated the problem, creating the possibility of missed signals and misunderstandings.

After the March exchanges between China and the Philippines over the Second Thomas Shoal (Reni Reef in Chinese), the Philippines submitted a case against China's nine-dash line and other aspects of China's South China Sea claims to an arbitration tribunal at The Hague.

In April, US President Barack Obama visited Asia (Japan, the Philippines, Malaysia and South Korea, three of which are US allies), and American troops carried out joint military exercises with the Philippines.

This month, 11 Chinese fishermen were arrested by the Philippines allegedly for catching endangered turtles while in disputed waters.

The Chinese government claimed that the sequence of events reflected US support behind the scenes, thus boosting Manila's confidence in provoking Beijing in the South China Sea.

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, therefore, "urged the US to treat these issues with objectivity and fairness, live up to its commitment, watch its words and actions, and avoid emboldening relevant parties' provocative actions".

President Obama's visit to South-east Asia reassured US allies and friends by confirming Washington's strategic commitments in the region.

Consequently, China has become the target of US strategic manoeuvres, although Mr Obama tried to downplay their "containment" purpose by calling China "a critical country to the region and the world".

For Chinese policymakers, China's rise is a bargaining process involving China and the outside world, especially the US. Given the US pivot or rebalancing towards Asia, China has no choice but to show its own resolve in order to negotiate new terms with Washington in the region. Strategically, China needs to choose carefully where it should use limited and controlled escalations, in order to send a warning against unscrupulous behaviour by some states.

More about

Purchase this article for republication.



Your daily good stuff - AsiaOne stories delivered straight to your inbox
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy policy and Terms and Conditions.