Backdated forms at heart of row

Backdated forms at heart of row

A WOMAN'S refusal to go through with a deal to sell her $3.68 million house to a couple has called into question at the High Court whether backdating property documents is lawful.

Madam Ting Siew May was sent an "option to purchase" (OTP) form by an agent acting for Madam Boon Lay Choo and her husband Law Khim Huat, who sought to buy her landed property in Jalan Angin Laut in Simei.

Madam Ting signed the form on Oct 13 last year but it had been backdated to Oct 4 - two days before tougher new loan rules kicked in.

This meant Madam Boon could apply for a mortgage under the older, less stringent rules. Under "property cooling" rules introduced by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), the loan-to-value ratio for new residential property loans was reduced to 60 per cent if the borrower's loan period extended beyond the retirement age of 65 years, among other things.

Prior to the Oct 6 cut-off date, Madam Boon and her husband, who are in their 50s, would have been eligible for a loan of up to 80 per cent of the property's value.

The couple, who had already paid the 1 per cent deposit, are seeking a High Court order to compel Madam Ting to complete the option to purchase exercise.

At issue is whether a backdated option to purchase form signed by the seller is valid, or whether the court will intervene to make the deal valid or quash it altogether.

Madam Ting is declining to sell her property and in so doing, is arguing that she did not know about the new MAS regulations when she signed the backdated OTP because she was in Indonesia with her son at the time.

Court papers filed by her lawyer P. Balagopal said she came to know of the MAS rules through her son Francis only when she returned to Singapore on Oct 19.

Purchase this article for republication.

BRANDED CONTENT

SPONSORED CONTENT

Your daily good stuff - AsiaOne stories delivered straight to your inbox
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy policy and Terms and Conditions.