Citizens' healthcare takes priority over medical tourism

Citizens' healthcare takes priority over medical tourism

Dr Jeremy Lim's appeal to revive medical tourism should not be considered in government hospitals, as the present healthcare infrastructure already has trouble meeting demand ("Why we must have foreign patients"; last Wednesday).

As it stands, our government hospitals, community hospitals and national specialist centres are struggling to cope with increasing demand for specialist care and in-patient care, with occupancy rates almost at full capacity.

Given the persistent bed crunch in hospitals, how could government hospitals accept more foreign patients?

With the impending commencement of MediShield Life, we would likely see a rise in citizens switching from private hospitals to government hospitals, and increased demand for Class B1 and Class A beds in government hospitals.

All government and community hospitals receive annual financial grants from the Ministry of Health to offset part of their operating costs.

Thus, all government hospitals must stay committed to giving priority to citizens seeking in-patient care, and not pursue profits from medical tourism.

Notwithstanding this, foreign patients are welcome to seek care in private hospitals. To develop and train the next generation of specialists, allow doctors who wish to specialise to practise in private and government hospitals concurrently.

Healthcare is a critical and essential government service and must not be viewed as a business enterprise.The healthcare needs of citizens take priority over earning more from medical tourism.

P'ng Siok Lee (Ms)


This article was first published on June 27, 2015.
Get a copy of The Straits Times or go to straitstimes.com for more stories.

This website is best viewed using the latest versions of web browsers.