Football: 2022 vote must be re-run if corruption proved

Football: 2022 vote must be re-run if corruption proved
An image made avilable by the Qatar's Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy (SC), on May 20, 2014, shows work starting in the second phase of construction at al-Wakrah Stadium, one of the proposed host venues to be delivered ahead of the Qatar 2022 FIFA World Cup.

LONDON - The vote for the hosting of the 2022 World Cup must be re-run if corruption allegations surrounding Qatar's winning campaign are proved to be accurate, Lord Goldsmith, a member of FIFA's Independent Governance Committee, said on Monday.

A British newspaper on Sunday claimed it had evidence that around US$5 million (S$6.28 million) was paid to officials in return for votes for Qatar's successful bid, allegations organisers have "vehemently" denied.

Goldsmith, Britain's former Attorney General, said that if football's world governing body was to weather scandals surrounding World Cup bids, it had to "to produce a convincing and transparent answer to these allegations".

"I believe that if these allegations are shown to be true, then the hosting decision for Qatar has to be rerun," he told BBC radio.

"I don't see how if it is proved, it is not proved yet though there is a case to answer, if it is proved, that the decision to give Qatar the World Cup was procured by frankly one can describe it in no other way as bribery and improper influence, then that decision ought not to stand."

The man at the centre of the allegations, Qatari former FIFA executive committee member and Asian Football Confederation chief Mohamed Bin Hammam, was not an official member of the bid team and has yet to comment publicly on the allegations.

Football's world governing body had already launched an investigation into corruption allegations surrounding the bid headed by American lawyer Michael Garcia, which was expected to report this year.

MUDDIED WATERS

If the unprecedented decision was taken to re-run the vote, it is fair to assume that the losers in the 2010 ballot, who had already spent millions of dollars satisfying the technical criteria for a bid, would be in the frame.

The convoluted way the 2018 and 2022 bidding processes became intertwined muddies the waters somewhat, but the United States, South Korea, Japan and Australia could all claim to have been most hard-done-by if any corruption was proven.

The United States, who finished second to Qatar in the final round of voting, has enough quality venues already functioning to host two World Cups.

They also have plentiful hotels and a track record of organising big events well, including the 1994 World Cup which is still the best-attended tournament.

The American line has been consistent throughout the controversy that has surrounded the Qatar triumph - that their sole focus is now on hosting the tournament in 2026.

Regional governing body CONCACAF have expressed a similar priority, although they are not necessarily committed to the US being their preferred choice as hosts. "From a CONCACAF perspective, our focus for the World Cup is 2026. We're committed to that," CONCACAF president Jeffrey Webb told reporters in New York last month.

Australia garnered just one vote in the first round of voting but similarly would also not need to embark on major venue or infrastructure construction if another host was required for 2022.

The country invested A$43 million (US$40.02 million) in their bid to host the tournament for the first time, though, and could find the political will to fund another attempt may be lacking.

More about

Purchase this article for republication.

BRANDINSIDER

SPONSORED

Most Read

Your daily good stuff - AsiaOne stories delivered straight to your inbox
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy policy and Terms and Conditions.