LONDON - Qatari organisers of football's 2022 World Cup have "vehemently" denied accusations their successful bid was corrupt, saying its lawyers were looking into claims made by a British Sunday newspaper.
The Qataris issued the denial after Jim Boyce, a vice-president of football's world governing body Fifa, said he would be in favour of rerunning the vote for the 2022 host nation, if the allegations in the Sunday Times could be proven.
In a report filling the first 11 pages of the newspaper, the Sunday Times claimed it had obtained millions of documents which they say show former Fifa executive committee member Mohamed Bin Hammam of Qatar made payments totalling around US$5 million (S$6.3 million) to football officials in return for votes for Qatar.
Qatar's Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy - the nation's World Cup organising committee - said it had won the right to stage the finals with "the best bid", and that it was "time for the Middle East to host its first Fifa World Cup".
"The Qatar 2022 Bid Committee always upheld the highest standard of ethics and integrity in its successful bid to host the 2022 Fifa World Cup," it said. "In regard to the latest allegations from The Sunday Times, we say again that Mohamed Bin Hammam played no official or unofficial role in Qatar's 2022 Bid Committee.
"As was the case with every other member of Fifa's Executive Committee, our bid team had to convince Mr Bin Hammam of the merits of our bid.
"We are cooperating fully with (head of Fifa's investigation into corruption) Mr (Michael) Garcia's on-going investigation and remain totally confident that any objective enquiry will conclude we won the bid to host the 2022 Fifa World Cup fairly.
"We will take whatever steps are necessary to defend the integrity of Qatar's bid."
Fifa would not comment on Sunday about the report, instead instructing Reuters to "kindly contact the office of the Chairman of the investigatory chamber of the independent Ethics Committee Michael Garcia directly".
The Washington-based law firm representing Garcia was not answering its telephone, and had not replied to a request for a comment.
New York lawyer Garcia was due to meet the Qataris in Oman on Monday in a meeting scheduled before the article was published, as he continues his questioning of those involved with Fifa and other bodies.
The Sunday Times printed what it said were details and excerpts of e-mail, letters and bank transfers in its vast report which it says prove Bin Hammam, president of the Asian Football Confederation for nine years and a Fifa executive committee member for 15 years, had made payments from secret slush funds.
FIFA vice-president Boyce, who was not on the executive committee at the time of the vote in December 2010, said Garcia should widen his investigation following the newspaper report.
"As a current member of the FIFA executive committee, we feel that any evidence whatsoever that people involved were bribed to do a certain vote, all that evidence should go to Michael Garcia... and let's await the report that comes back from Garcia. "If Garcia's... recommendations are that wrongdoing happened for that vote for the 2022 World Cup, I certainly... would have absolutely no problem whatsoever if the recommendation was for a re-vote," the Northern Irishman told BBC radio.