Court rejects challenge on gay-sex law

Court rejects challenge on gay-sex law

For the second time this year, a Singapore court has rejected a challenge against the law which criminalises sex between men.

Justice Quentin Loh on Wednesday dismissed Mr Tan Eng Hong's claim that Section 377A of the Penal Code was unconstitutional and infringed his rights, ruling that it was not yet proven that people are born homosexuals.

In April, the same judge also ruled against a similar challenge made by gay couple Gary Lim, 44, and Kenneth Chee, 37.

In his 54-page written judgment on Wednesday, Justice Loh said he had not changed his mind since his earlier decision.

Still, just like his previous judgment, he added that it was up to Parliament to revise the law, which prescribes a maximum penalty of two years in jail for sexual acts between men, if it believes that the tide of social and public opinion has shifted.

Mr Tan, 49, was the first to fight the law here in 2010 after he was caught having oral sex with another man in a public toilet.

He claimed that it infringed his right to equal treatment under the law, as guaranteed by the Constitution.

His lawyer M. Ravi claimed that Section 377A did not qualify as "law" as it was absurd. This was because people are born homosexuals and not able to change this characteristic, he argued. But Justice Loh rejected this.

Having gone through scientific literature on the matter, he said the evidence remains divided and inconclusive at best.

More about

Purchase this article for republication.

BRANDINSIDER

SPONSORED

Most Read

Your daily good stuff - AsiaOne stories delivered straight to your inbox
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy policy and Terms and Conditions.