Freedom of navigation vital to S'pore

Freedom of navigation vital to S'pore
To leverage more on Singapore's soft power assets, NMP Tan Tai Yong suggested expanding cultural exchange opportunities for youth to forge friendships abroad, while regional heritage bodies could work together to showcase the connectedness of the region before colonisation.

Freedom of navigation on the high seas is an economically existential issue for Singapore, as trade flow is vital to the country's existence as a sovereign state, Foreign Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam told Parliament yesterday.

At the same time, China has confirmed at the highest levels, including through Premier Li Keqiang, that it guarantees freedom of navigation in the South China Sea, he noted during the Committee of Supply debate on his ministry's budget.

Mr Shanmugam was replying to a question by Non-Constituency MP Gerald Giam, who expressed concern about China's extensive building on reefs and islands in those waters. Mr Giam asked what Singapore, and ASEAN, would do if China threatens freedom of navigation.

"At this stage, that remains a hypothetical question," Mr Shanmugam replied, citing the assurances by top Chinese officials.

"We cannot presuppose, one way or another, whether China is entitled to build on these islands and reefs, because that's a circular question," he said.

"It depends on whether China owns those islands and to what extent it has an EEZ (exclusive economic zone) and to what extent it has territorial sea, and whether these are islands which are capable of generating either territorial sea or EEZ.

"And these are questions on which we take no position," he said. "They are to be sorted out between the various claimant states and subject to international law."

ASEAN has begun negotiations with Beijing to agree on a framework or Code of Conduct to better manage tensions at sea.

Four ASEAN countries - Brunei, Malaysia, the Philippines and Vietnam - have territorial claims in the South China Sea that overlap with China's, and tense incidents over the past year have lent urgency to the need for this code.

Singapore's task is to focus on this code, said Mr Shanmugam, who noted that China has indicated its willingness to work towards it, most recently at the ASEAN-China Summit in Naypyitaw last November. ASEAN also provides a platform, whether at the ASEAN-China, ASEAN Plus Three or East Asia summit, for officials to discuss these issues with China at the highest levels, he added.

Dr Lim Wee Kiak (Nee Soon GRC), Ms Ellen Lee (Sembawang GRC) and Mr Ong Teng Koon (Sembawang GRC) had also asked about the situation in the Asia-Pacific, including relations between major powers.

Against the backdrop of tensions in the South China Sea, Mr Shanmugam stressed it was important to remember that the ASEAN-China partnership is a broad-based one.

China is either the largest or second-largest trading partner and investor in most ASEAN countries, and the relationship between Beijing and South-east Asian capitals has deepened.

"If you look at mainland South-east Asia, it is being criss-crossed with infrastructure, often financed by Chinese capital and built by Chinese companies, which integrates mainland South-east Asia effectively with southern China," he said.

"It increases their economic vibrancy and the whole region is becoming integrated economically."

China is also the engine driving important regional initiatives such as the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, which aims to fund key development projects.

"We try and keep relations on an even keel," he added, noting that Singapore takes over from Thailand as country coordinator of ASEAN-China dialogue relations later this year.

"We have limited influence on major power relations," he said, adding that Singapore has created a small role through its active participation in regional platforms.

"We try to be an honest broker in dealing with these issues and in our relations with the major powers," he said.

"We work closely with like-minded countries to encourage the constructive engagement of the major powers in our region."

S'pore can use more soft power for cultural diplomacy: MPS

Singapore should do more to leverage on its soft power assets - from food to tourism - as a form of cultural diplomacy, two MPs said yesterday.

"Cultural diplomacy can help to create a foundation of trust and shared interests with citizens of other countries," said Nominated MP Tan Tai Yong, a history professor.

"This is our best insurance against misunderstanding, hatred, and terrorism targeted at our small city-state and our values," he told the House.

He suggested expanding cultural exchange opportunities for youth to forge friendships abroad, while regional heritage bodies could work together to showcase the connectedness of the region before colonisation.

Mr Sitoh Yih Pin (Potong Pasir) cited South Korea as a stellar example of soft power, with its dramas, music and food, and offered several ideas.

He said: "Singapore has quite a large amount of soft power. We just don't really think about it, or give ourselves credit for it." Pop stars like Stefanie Sun, icons like Changi Airport and Singapore Airlines, and even Singapore's widely used maths textbooks are symbols of soft power, he added.

Foreign Minister K. Shanmugam said his ministry had been deploying soft power, which was a key priority "from minister downwards".

He said: "Our relevance and soft power stem from our success. No one will really pay us any attention if we are a failed state. We have to continue to ensure that to be relevant internationally, we must remain exceptional."

This article was first published on Mar 6, 2015.
Get a copy of The Straits Times or go to for more stories.

More about

Purchase this article for republication.



Your daily good stuff - AsiaOne stories delivered straight to your inbox
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy policy and Terms and Conditions.