Income inequality stabilised, says Govt

Income inequality stabilised, says Govt
Acting Minister for Culture, Community and Youth Lawrence Wong fielding questions on the Budget from students of the Singapore Management University. Mr Wong said the Government's efforts to create inclusive growth have stabilised Singapore's Gini coefficient which measures income inequality.

THE Government's efforts to bring about inclusive, quality growth have effectively stabilised Singapore's Gini coefficient which measures income inequality, said Acting Minister for Culture, Community and Youth Lawrence Wong on Monday at a dialogue on the Budget.

This has been done through making taxes more progressive and increasing social spending, he added.

As a result, Singapore's Gini coefficient - a measure of income inequality that ranges from zero to one, with higher values indicating more inequality - had "come down sharply" last year. After government transfers, it was 0.412, the lowest in a decade.

Mr Wong was responding to a question from a Singapore Management University (SMU) student who said this year's Budget did little to address inequality and wanted to know how the Government was dealing with income inequality in particular.

The minister said it was a misconception that growth would always worsen income inequality, and Singapore's experience in the last five years had debunked this.

Although the economy had grown, said Mr Wong, the Gini had stabilised.

"(In the last five years), there is no correlation in terms of growth going up and Gini going up as well. It can happen, but it didn't happen in our case," he said.

This was due to a "concerted attempt" by the Government to grow Singapore's economy in an inclusive and sustainable way, with the returns from growth ploughed back into schemes to help the lower income, he added.

About 80 per cent of all government transfers through taxes, handouts and subsidies, for example, had gone to the bottom decile, or the lowest 10 per cent by income. In comparison, they had received about 40 per cent of transfers in 2003.

Over the years, income tax for top earners had risen while those for the lower end had gone into negative territory, with the Government topping up their wages, said Mr Wong.

With these subsidies factored in, the income tax spread was closer to 40 or 50 percentage points, instead of 20 percentage points, he added.

More about

Income inequality
Purchase this article for republication.

BRANDED CONTENT

SPONSORED CONTENT

Your daily good stuff - AsiaOne stories delivered straight to your inbox
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy policy and Terms and Conditions.