A significant change proposed to consumer protection laws could expose errant retailers, even if they try to close and reopen their shops under a different name.
Once a court order has been taken up against them, they will no longer be able to brush it under the carpet by reappearing in a new guise.
Instead, they will be required to inform their customers about the court order - for instance, through a notice printed on invoices.
This measure is among those that have been proposed to strengthen the Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act.
The exercise began after the outcry over unethical practices at electronics mall Sim Lim Square last year, when a video of a Vietnamese tourist begging a shopkeeper for a refund went viral.
The move could also plug a loophole perennially exploited by errant retailers.
While the Consumers Association of Singapore (Case) and the Singapore Tourism Board can take up court orders against such retailers, some of them have dodged penalties by closing their shops and reopening them under different names.
Revealing the latest step proposed to counter this, Teo Ser Luck, Minister of State for Trade and Industry, said yesterday: "This is not a deterrent to set up businesses, but a deterrent to unfair practices."
He added that errant retailers hurt Singapore's reputation as a place to shop.
An agency within the Ministry of Trade and Industry (MTI) will be appointed to work closely with Case to investigate and take action against recalcitrant shops, he said.
After a public consultation on the proposed measures, MTI aims to table a Bill in Parliament by the first quarter of next year.
Get MyPaper for more stories.