Pros and cons of a limited strike against Syria

Pros and cons of a limited strike against Syria
Protesters hold banners against a potential air strike in Syria in front of the US Embassy in Sofia on September 4, 2013.

UNITED STATES - Citing intelligence reports, the United States says the Syrian government used sarin gas on its own citizens during an Aug 21 attack on opposition forces outside Damascus. It also says that 1,429 people died, including 426 children.

Following a request from US President Barack Obama, members of Congress will soon decide whether to authorise the use of military force to punish the Syrian regime led by President Bashar al-Assad.

Having earlier declared the use of chemical weapons by Syria against combatants to be a "red line" that would trigger US intervention, President Obama is now obliged to act or spend the remainder of his presidency in ignominy.

But as commentators around the globe have been pointing out in recent days, there is much more to it than that.

Given that domestic politics in the US rules out the possibility of a "boots on the ground" approach, what can - or should - Washington do to prevent such attacks occurring in future?

Indeed, is there anything at all that it can do?

More about

Syria
Purchase this article for republication.

BRANDINSIDER

SPONSORED

Most Read

Your daily good stuff - AsiaOne stories delivered straight to your inbox
By signing up, you agree to our Privacy policy and Terms and Conditions.