NAYPYIDAW, Myanmar - A surprise deal between the United States and China on Wednesday could be a breakthrough moment in decades-long efforts to secure a global climate change pact, environment experts said.
However major questions remain over whether the world's two biggest polluters can achieve their new targets on curbing greenhouse gas emissions, while analysts say they will eventually need to do much more.
At a summit in Beijing, US President Barack Obama and his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping, announced their two nations had put aside years of acrimony on climate change and would co-operate in the global warming fight.
Al Gore, the former US vice-president who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007 for sounding the alarm on climate change, was among environmental heavy-hitters from around the world who celebrated the move.
"Today's joint announcement... to reduce their nations' carbon emissions is a major step forward in the global effort to solve the climate crisis," Gore said in a statement.
"Much more will be required - including a global agreement from all nations - but these actions demonstrate a serious commitment by the top two global polluters." One key part of the deal saw China commit for the first time to limiting its greenhouse gas output - by setting a target of around 2030 for its emissions to peak.
It also pledged that 20 per cent of its energy would come from renewable sources by 2030, a colossal undertaking equivalent to powering the United States national grid purely through non-fossil fuels.
Obama said the United States would cut its own emissions of greenhouse gases by 26-28 per cent from 2005 levels by 2025.
The announcement was widely hailed as a vital step in securing a global pact at a United Nations summit in Paris next year to limit global warming to two degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit).
That level is seen as the maximum before a tipping point for catastrophic droughts, floods, species extinction and other disasters is reached.
The United Nations' process has floundered since efforts to achieve a similar pact at a 2009 summit in Copenhagen crumbled.
Long-standing feuding between the United States and China - who are jointly responsible for 45 per cent of the world's greenhouse gas emissions - were a key reason for the Copenhagen failure, and subsequent stalemates.
The United States had long maintained that it would not sign up to any global pact, including the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, unless China and other developing nations committed to cutting their emissions.
But China insisted that it should not have to commit to scaling back its emissions because it was a poorer country and needed fossil fuels to help drive prosperity.
It said the United States and other rich nations were more responsible because they had done the bulk of the polluting since the start of industrialisation.